For clients considering catalysts for the Convective Steam Conversion Process, it is essential to align the choice with the innovative technologies such as the Convective Conversion Process (HTCR) by Haldor Topsoe. Here are key considerations from the client's perspective:
Compatibility with Innovative Processes:
Opt for catalysts that align with the Convective Conversion Process (HTCR) technology by Haldor Topsoe.
Ensure the steam reforming catalyst enhances steam conversion reactions and supports the self-balancing mechanism for steam and fuel.
Efficient Waste Heat Utilization:
Choose catalysts that contribute to the efficient utilization of waste heat, emphasizing optimal steam production and effective utilization of process steam.
Unit Scale Considerations:
Evaluate the scale of the hydrogen production unit, considering that the design is suitable for units ranging from 5,000 to 30,000 m³/h.
Flexibility and Automation:
Prioritize catalysts that enhance the flexibility of operation, rapid installation, and high levels of automation for automatic start and stop.
Mobility and Cost-Effectiveness:
Consider catalysts that complement mobile unit designs, allowing for easy relocation between different sites.
Take into account the cost-effectiveness of catalysts, considering the lower investment associated with innovative designs compared to conventional conversion furnaces.
HTER Solution Integration:
Explore the integration of HTER (Convective Conversion Process by Haldor Topsoe) as an additional solution for increased unit capacity.
Consider the retrofit cost and the relatively quick modification period of 3 to 6 weeks when evaluating the HTER solution.
Assess the feasibility of parallel connection of more than 10 reactors with the HTER solution.
By considering these factors, clients can make informed decisions about catalyst selection, ensuring optimal performance and efficiency in the Convective Steam Conversion Process, aligned with innovative technologies for hydrogen production.